A map of programs. The Constraint Program defines admissibility; downstream programs apply it.
Defines admissibility (what can continue) under finite resolution, bounded observability, and enforced structure.
The following programs apply the admissibility framework defined by the Constraint Program to specific system classes. They establish jurisdictional scope only. They do not disclose methods, algorithms, policies, or implementations.
Socio-technical systems
Domains
Artificial intelligence systems, autonomous agents, foundation models, safety-critical software, and machine-mediated decision systems.
Scope
Characterizes when continuation becomes inadmissible prior to alignment, reward modeling, or optimization, with emphasis on observer-only posture, refusal conditions, and abstention constraints.
Domains
Governments, corporations, regulatory bodies, financial institutions, standards organizations, and large-scale bureaucratic systems.
Scope
Characterizes structural loss of continuation arising from constraint accumulation, observability collapse, or enforcement saturation, independent of policy design or incentives.
Domains
Capital markets, credit systems, liquidity networks, clearing mechanisms, and market infrastructures.
Scope
Frames admissibility boundaries for market states, treating liquidity as observability and systemic crashes as continuation failure rather than informational surprise.
Domains
Energy grids, telecommunications networks, compute infrastructure, cloud platforms, and critical physical-digital systems.
Scope
Characterizes continuation and failure under finite observability and delayed feedback, where optimization and local control can induce global breakdown.
Frontier physics systems
Plasma containment as continuation under constraint
Scope
Defines admissibility and refusal conditions near instability surfaces under finite sensing and irreversible excursions—without control, tuning, or performance claims.
Inherits admissibility from the Constraint Program.
Coherence as finite-bandwidth continuation
Scope
Characterizes when quantum evolution remains structurally admissible under decoherence, measurement constraints, and coupling—without optimization or device prescriptions.
Inherits admissibility from the Constraint Program.
These programs inherit admissibility as defined by the Constraint Program. Domain-specific analyses are considered derivative and non-authoritative.
Program names and scopes are declarative; subsequent work that applies admissibility to these domains is downstream by definition.
Canonical fence note defining CC ↔ ZOA jurisdictional boundaries.
Identity claims require persistence under admissible evolution; pointwise resemblance alone is insufficient.
Canonical definitions + refusal boundaries; no methods.
Canonical vocabulary + refusal boundaries for continuation, recursion, resolution, and anchoring; no methods.
Reserved entries are catalog placeholders only; they do not indicate deployment sequence, methods, thresholds, or system behavior.
Admissible structure precedes explanation.
Attractor geometry under constraint
Spectral decomposition / tensor structure